On gardening clothes



Whole publications, industries, lives even, revolve around the pleasure that some people get from the choosing of clothes. It would be foolish for me, who delights in many much stranger hobbies, to denigrate the millions for whom this is a joy-giving aspect of existence, but I must confess, the opposite is true for me. If the selection of clothes does ever bring me joy it is, paradoxically, when no real selection is required whatsoever. When, in anticipation of a day romping around lanes and fields where, if I am unlucky I might bump into two or three other souls, I can throw on whatever is closest to hand. I recall once, when back in the midst of my family, I threw on just such an outfit that consisted of an old shirt of my father’s, a jumper, scarred from active service on the frontline in the back of the wardrobe taking the battle to the moths, some tracksuit bottoms, a pair of wellington boots and a coat which, when I returned from said ramble, one of my sisters informed me, with horror, in fact belonged to her.

I call such get ups ‘gardening clothes’- although horticulture, realistically, here performs the same linguistic face-saving as it does in ‘gardening leave’. One might choose to tend to plants in such an outfit, but one might equally choose to burn or break down or simply ignore greenery altogether whilst adorned in whatever ragtag ensemble was thrown together on one’s return from the world of sleep. Gardening clothes are, to my mind, those items we throw onto our corporeal forms for no other reason than practicality- they adorn us not with beauty, nor do they signify position or authority: they are the direct inheritors of the fig leaves of Eden- they cover our nakedness, and no more. 

 Except, of course, there is more- they bring us comfort. Invariably, part of this is physical- I sincerely doubt many would choose corsets, or starched collars, or high heels as their gardening garments of choice- but it is emotional too. The comforting nature of, say, an old jersey is not necessarily in proportion to its material quality, but rather, inevitably, related to its role as a repository of memories. A rip here or an unravelling there are reminders of joys past- and so their presence echoes the reverberations of said joyfulness into the present, making them objects (or more properly, absences) that are joys in and of themselves. When there are whole wine soaked suppers that can be narrated using only the stains on a dress shirt then it seems only natural that a degree of affection for such a prop might develop.

Most of all though clothes like the my gardening outfit are comforting because they indicate a level, I suppose, of freedom. They are a statement that one is so at ease with ones surroundings and company that that the externals cease to matter. Of course, such a statement might also be made performatively; but I cannot believe that the carefully distressed mackintoshes of Shoreditch are really worn with the same internal glow of satisfaction as the moth-addled jumpers of Barsetshire. Comfortable clothes are not, then, just a matter of fabric softener, but indicators of where and when our very souls are most at ease. The next step to such logic, worryingly, might well be vacuuming in the nude- but I fear that the apparatus involved in such an activity is so fraught with the risk of all too real physical discomfort as to be not worth making such an intellectual leap.

There is, perhaps, a class aspect to all this- maybe those of us who are forced by the happy yoke of fate into positions of luck and responsibility where we are ordinarily expected to dress appropriately are the only ones for whom to wear simply what we wish, rather than what we have to, is a source of pleasure. A prisoner has little choice with regard to his wardrobe after all. But, such concerns are for another time, and another outfit. I recall an episode of Keeping Up Appearances, the plot of which gravitates around Hyacinth Bucket’s mistaking of a peer for a gardener. She was not the first, of course. My mind inexorably turns to Mary Magdalene, who, thinking him to be the gardener, misidentified not a peer, but a king. Strange gardening clothes then, those resurrected robes of white, but ones, I hope, we might all find to be to our comfort in the end.

Popular posts from this blog

On the Ristorante Abruzzi, Rome

I forget which biography of Napoleon it is- I read it, pages dusty and his story then fresh to me, as a teenager many years ago- but in it an English historian, pivoting on a Whig pin head so as to look both up at and down upon the little corporal, dedicates a whole paragraph to sneering at his preference for ‘peasant’ cuisine. Amidst the initials and crowns and bees so carefully embroidered in gold, the Terror of Europe would wolf down dishes of beans and onions and pork whilst the Tsars and Kings and Popes whom he confounded quailed over their daintily prepared repasts. If only Gillray had had access to the great tyrant’s stodgy and simplistic menus, how much more eviscerating would that master’s pen and ink have been! Sadly, our histories of Bonaparte- in English at least- focus on those aspects considered worthy; his conquests or his politics or his women. I blame the Romantics. Shelley’s ‘child of a fierce hour’ might have oscillated in their fevered imaginations between bei
Read more

On the Rose and Crown, Oxford

When living in Prague I heard a story- no great achievement in itself, for in that city there is a fable underneath every cobble- that stuck with me. Every day, without exception, there would shuffle into the Trade Fair Palace, wherein are stored the choicest specimens of the Czech national art collection, an old man. He would pay no attention to the staff, nor his fellow visitors, the jauntily curated collations of works were as nothing to him, as were the joys of every other painting except one: Edvard Munch’s Dance on the Shore . To this piece- charming enough but in no critic’s estimation an especially noteworthy effort, he would make a beeline and stand, transfixed for precisely an hour before leaving without so much as casting an eye in the direction of the Gauguins or Picassos or Muchas round about it. When he died, it was said that over the course of his long life he had stared at the painting for some tens of thousands of hours. I cannot claim to have any such idea of nu
Read more

On the Hippodrome in Karlovy Vary

God- and for that matter, my liver- knows I am no Puritan. Now, like anyone interested in the strange nature of the English, I quote with glee Isaac Foot’s method for the discernment of character- ‘I judge a man by one thing, which side would he have liked his ancestors to fight on at Marston Moor’- but endorsement, as many a Twitter biography, fearful of that malevolent platform’s tendency to turn even nastier than it already is, reminds us, is not necessarily the natural outworking of quotation. I need hardly resort to references from the Almighty, or my organs, to reveal that the late Mr Foot and I- though agreeing on the importance of Marston Moor- would not have been shoulder to shoulder on that windswept patch of land bisected in latter days by the B1224. Yet, for all my cavalier enthusiasm, I find the characters on the side I purport to retrospectively back difficult to relate to. As with all good fiction, the stories we tell about the past are most powerful when, in the i
Read more